57 Channels (and nothin’ on) Darkest Hour

Darkest Hour is set during a particularly tense time in British history. The Nazis were at their most powerful, combatting their way through Europe and threatening the very existence of the United Kingdom. It focuses on Winston Churchill’s role in his early days as Prime Minister. He must decide whether to negotiate with Hitler or rally the nation and fight on against incredible odds.

Gary Oldman was rewarded an Oscar for the role of the British Prime Minister in this film. I must say, though, that I found his acting a bit excessive. I’d rather draw attention to the performances of Churchill’s wife and and his secretary (Kristin Scott Thomas and Lily James), who both with remarkably small gestures portray their characters’ stoic patience during the most tumultuous of times.

Darkest Hour and Dunkirk are examples of films, on screen now, with a nostalgic retrospective to the time when Great Britain indeed was great, a superpower to be reckoned with (Rule Britannia echoing worldwide). Both Darkest Hour and Dunkirk originated some time before the Brexit referendum in June 2016, but now feeding off the contemporary British Europhobia and nationalism that currently split the nation.

Praised by the Eurosceptics as proof of British superiority. A way to applaud themselves on the past (an idealised past) and to empower nationalism. Meaning that it’s sometimes necessary, if continental Europe is going one way, for Britain to go the other.

The Europhiles proud of Britain’s key role in Europe and its history. Upholding the duty of being a protector of the European constitution, which core essence is alliance, agreement and confederation.

The scene (a scene with no historical basis) where the Prime Minister talks to the “people” and holds a mini-referendum among the commuters in the London Underground, on whether to plea for peace or go to battle draws a striking parallel to the actual EU referendum.

(Thank heavens the British people were there to help their leaders make such a big decision that would change the course of their country’s history for generations to come, who knows what sort of blooper Parliament could have ended up making otherwise (I hope you note the irony! 😖))

I rate this film 4,5 out of 5. It’s a grand film which manages to capture the mood of an extremely difficult time in the history of Europe.

One comment

  1. I saw this movie few months ago. I find absolutely good for characters, Gary Oldman is a great actor, but poor from the historical point of view. For example: What is the story of the Dunkirk retreat? Why King George changed his opinion about Churchill? So, I think this is a great film but left me a little bitter in the mouth because I don’t understand if this movie is a historical movie or biography of Churchill
    However , I totally agree with your fine reasoning about some British’s Pride all time long during the movie. The Spirit Of the ‘lost’ Emperor wafted along all movie, in most dialogue and in the soul of the
    Good post Anna! Nice read!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to nebraska78 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.